<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:55:47 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Unnecesarean: The Blog</title><subtitle>Blog</subtitle><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/atom.xml"/><updated>2012-02-14T17:24:12Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>CesareanRates.com</title><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/2/14/cesareanratescom.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/2/14/cesareanratescom.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2012-02-14T17:13:52Z</published><updated>2012-02-14T17:13:52Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-inline ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://www.cesareanrates.com" target="_blank"><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/storage/fb_logo.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1329240161968" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
<p>Come on over to&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cesareanrates.com" target="_blank">cesareanrates.com</a>. The Unnecesarean will be updated weekly from this point on. May this post serve as an apology for the exceptionally weird and/or corny content in the past months while I got the new site ready. I am sure you have had your fill of photoshoppery and sarcasm.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>A Victory for Activists™: Censoring the Glory of the Belly</title><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/2/2/a-victory-for-activists-censoring-the-glory-of-the-belly.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/2/2/a-victory-for-activists-censoring-the-glory-of-the-belly.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2012-02-02T16:57:43Z</published><updated>2012-02-02T16:57:43Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I had planned to post something substantial today but this is so much better.</p>
<p>I re-posted (<a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.phpfbid=362854090410572&amp;set=a.244961755533140.79248.223245027704813&amp;type=1&amp;theater" target="_blank">from here</a>) this glorious photo series of bellies to the Facebook page. Bellies&#8230; they&#8217;re so beautiful. I revere them. You should, too.</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Venn Diagram of Site Metrics: Readership of The Unnecesarean</title><category term="The Unnecesarean"/><category term="theunnecesarean.com venn diagram"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/27/venn-diagram-of-site-metrics-readership-of-the-unnecesarean.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/27/venn-diagram-of-site-metrics-readership-of-the-unnecesarean.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2012-01-27T17:23:05Z</published><updated>2012-01-27T17:23:05Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[How exactly would one describe our large, lurky readership? With science, of course.&nbsp;
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Home Births in the United States, 1990-2009</title><category term="CDC home birth"/><category term="Home Birth"/><category term="NCHS data brief home birth"/><category term="declercq home birth"/><category term="home birth trends"/><category term="mcdorman declercq"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/26/home-births-in-the-united-states-1990-2009.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/26/home-births-in-the-united-states-1990-2009.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2012-01-26T17:52:39Z</published><updated>2012-01-26T17:52:39Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>
<p><a type="button_count" name="fb_share" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php">Share</a><script src="http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share" type="text/javascript"></script>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>CDC National Center for Health Statistics released a <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db84.htm" target="_blank">new data brief</a> today on home birth in the United States.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>Key findings include:</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<blockquote>
<p>After a decline from 1990 to 2004, the percentage of U.S. births that occurred at home increased by 29%, from 0.56% of births in 2004 to 0.72% in 2009.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For non-Hispanic white women, home births increased by 36%, from 0.80% in 2004 to 1.09% in 2009. About 1 in every 90 births for non-Hispanic white women is now a home birth. Home births are less common among women of other racial or ethnic groups.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Home births are more common among women aged 35 and over, and among women with several previous children.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Home births have a lower risk profile than hospital births, with fewer births to teenagers or unmarried women, and with fewer preterm, low birthweight, and multiple births.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The percentage of home births in 2009 varied from a low of 0.2% of births in Louisiana and the District of Columbia, to a high of 2.0% in Oregon and 2.6% in Montana.</p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/storage/CDC_logo.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1327600981102" alt="" /></span></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db84.htm" target="_blank">NCHS Data Brief No. 84: Home Births in the United States, 1990&ndash;2009</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Down Home Gynecology</title><category term="Down Home Gynecology"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/24/down-home-gynecology.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/24/down-home-gynecology.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2012-01-24T16:04:31Z</published><updated>2012-01-24T16:04:31Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[A friend just inquired as to whether I wrote this. The answer is yes. Of course I did. And I posed for the rendering that also appears on mudflaps which you can pick up for $27.99 at your nearest NAPA Auto Parts. Incidentally, you can also pick up a lot of the down home gyno supplies recommended in my book at NAPA, so bring your checkbook.
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Why It's Difficult to Calculate Provider-Level Cesarean Rates</title><category term="Cesarean Rate"/><category term="calculate c-section rate"/><category term="how to calculate cesarean rate"/><category term="provider level cesarean rates"/><category term="search doctor cesarean rates"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/18/why-its-difficult-to-calculate-provider-level-cesarean-rates.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/18/why-its-difficult-to-calculate-provider-level-cesarean-rates.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2012-01-18T14:45:00Z</published><updated>2012-01-18T14:45:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Guest post by Jill&#8217;s Friend, MD</em></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I was asked my cesarean rate recently and gave my stock answer of &#8220;I do not know. I have never calculated the percentage because it is as low as possible, so why bother with the number?&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This.</p>
<p>Was.</p>
<p>The.</p>
<p>Wrong.</p>
<p>Answer.</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Iowa Cesarean Rates by Hospital, 2010</title><category term="Cesarean Rate"/><category term="iowa cesarean rates"/><category term="iowa hospital c-section rates"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/11/iowa-cesarean-rates-by-hospital-2010.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/11/iowa-cesarean-rates-by-hospital-2010.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2012-01-11T16:27:03Z</published><updated>2012-01-11T16:27:03Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[SOURCE:&nbsp;Iowa Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Statistics
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>"Non C-Section Deliveries"</title><category term="800 lb vagina"/><category term="800 pound vagina in the room"/><category term="C-Section"/><category term="Cesarean"/><category term="Vaginal Birth"/><category term="Vaginal Birth"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/6/non-c-section-deliveries.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/6/non-c-section-deliveries.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2012-01-06T20:39:53Z</published><updated>2012-01-06T20:39:53Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[Aw, c&#8217;mon now. Really?
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Twin Birth Rate in the U.S. Rose 76 Percent in Two Decades</title><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/4/twin-birth-rate-in-the-us-rose-76-percent-in-two-decades.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2012/1/4/twin-birth-rate-in-the-us-rose-76-percent-in-two-decades.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2012-01-04T17:01:00Z</published><updated>2012-01-04T17:01:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[CDC NCHS released a new data brief this morning on twin births in the United States from 1980 to 2009. Here are the key findings from the report:
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Working to Ban VBAC at Your Hospital? Then Stop Griping About Home Birth</title><category term="Homebirth"/><category term="VBAC"/><category term="home birth"/><category term="hospital ban vaginal birth"/><category term="vbac ban"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/12/22/working-to-ban-vbac-at-your-hospital-then-stop-griping-about.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/12/22/working-to-ban-vbac-at-your-hospital-then-stop-griping-about.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-12-22T14:51:52Z</published><updated>2011-12-22T14:51:52Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black;">I posted this prompt over yonder on the Facebook page:</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;"><em><strong>Here is question posted here by Nicole: &#8220;So what are you supposed to do when the hospital closest to you has a VBAC ban? Show up when ready to push?&#8221; What did you do? Stories?</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Responses are pasted below.</span></p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Minnesota Cesarean Rates by Hospital, 2010</title><category term="Cesarean Rate"/><category term="minnesota hospital c-section rates"/><category term="minnesota hospital cesarean rates"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/12/13/minnesota-cesarean-rates-by-hospital-2010.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/12/13/minnesota-cesarean-rates-by-hospital-2010.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-12-13T13:54:44Z</published><updated>2011-12-13T13:54:44Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[SOURCE: Minnesota Hospital Assocation
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Massachusetts Ten Highest Total Cesarean Rates, 2008 and 2009</title><category term="2009 massachusetts c-section rate"/><category term="2010 massachusetts cesarean"/><category term="Cesarean Rate"/><category term="massachusetts cesarean rates"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/12/10/massachusetts-ten-highest-total-cesarean-rates-2008-and-2009.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/12/10/massachusetts-ten-highest-total-cesarean-rates-2008-and-2009.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-12-10T17:45:00Z</published><updated>2011-12-10T17:45:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[Almost as fun as The Late Show Top Ten List, but not.
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Perinatal Quality Collaborative of North Carolina Receives $1M in Support</title><category term="Health Care Reform"/><category term="Hospital Birth"/><category term="Iatrogenic"/><category term="PQCNC blue cross"/><category term="Public Health"/><category term="induction video maverick"/><category term="maverick video baby"/><category term="perinatal quality collaborative of north carolina"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/12/6/perinatal-quality-collaborative-of-north-carolina-receives-1.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/12/6/perinatal-quality-collaborative-of-north-carolina-receives-1.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-12-06T15:30:00Z</published><updated>2011-12-06T15:30:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[I have kept tabs on the Perinatal Quality Collaborative of North Carolina since they produced the following video, <em>Maverick</em>, in which a mom talks about the repercussions of an early induction of her baby. PQCNC has managed to get more than half of North Carolina&rsquo;s 91 hospitals that deliver babies to participate in their initiatives, which focus on quality improvement and cost reduction.
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Illinois Cesarean Rates by Hospital, 2010</title><category term="Cesarean Rate"/><category term="iIL cesarean rates by hospital"/><category term="illinois c-section rate"/><category term="illinois cesaeran rates"/><category term="rush medical center cesarean rate"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/12/4/illinois-cesarean-rates-by-hospital-2010.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/12/4/illinois-cesarean-rates-by-hospital-2010.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-12-04T13:00:00Z</published><updated>2011-12-04T13:00:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[The above data for the calendar year 2010 can be found on the Illinois Health Facilities and Services Review Board site, which falls under the auspices of the Illinois Department of Public Health. The report that lists both live births by hospital and number of cesareans performed at each hospital is called the Annual Hospital Quality Data Spreadsheet, which was last revised on November 29, 2011.
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>The Nativity Story: 2011</title><category term="Lauren Plante"/><category term="mary joseph"/><category term="nativity story modern"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/28/the-nativity-story-2011.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/28/the-nativity-story-2011.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-28T14:00:00Z</published><updated>2011-11-28T14:00:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>By Lauren Plante, MD&nbsp;</em></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
A couple thousand years ago, a nice Jewish girl has a baby in a stable. Rejoicing ensues. And so it should: the astonishing event of birth resonates with us at&nbsp; a primal level. It&rsquo;s an everyday occurrence&#8230;</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Better Risk Counseling Tends to Lower Procedure Utilization</title><category term="Birth in the Media"/><category term="Birth trauma"/><category term="C-Section"/><category term="Cesarean Rate"/><category term="Choice in Birth"/><category term="Hospital Birth"/><category term="NHS caesarean"/><category term="NHS cesarean on demand too posh to push"/><category term="NHS elective cesarean"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/27/better-risk-counseling-tends-to-lower-procedure-utilization.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/27/better-risk-counseling-tends-to-lower-procedure-utilization.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-27T14:16:05Z</published><updated>2011-11-27T14:16:05Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/storage/counseling.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1322405539416" alt="" /></p>
<p>In case you&rsquo;re not following the recent round of articles about the National Health Service&rsquo;s new guidelines about cesareans, here&rsquo;s a quick round-up.</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>PhotoShop: Bradley Book Guy and Short-Shorts</title><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/23/photoshop-bradley-book-guy-and-short-shorts.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/23/photoshop-bradley-book-guy-and-short-shorts.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-23T15:08:28Z</published><updated>2011-11-23T15:08:28Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t feel like doing anything this week. Can you please PhotoShop the Bradley Book Guy and email me your masterpiece by tomorrow? I will post the ones that make me laugh the hardest on Friday. Why? Because short-shorts. Your template awaits&#8230;
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>How I Would Counsel a Woman with a Suspected Large Baby</title><category term="Big Baby"/><category term="C-Section"/><category term="Informed Consent"/><category term="Macrosomia"/><category term="Shoulder Dystocia"/><category term="Suspected Large Baby"/><category term="Vaginal Birth"/><category term="gestational diabetes baby size"/><category term="suspected macrosomia"/><category term="vaginal birth large baby"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/20/how-i-would-counsel-a-woman-with-a-suspected-large-baby.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/20/how-i-would-counsel-a-woman-with-a-suspected-large-baby.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-20T16:29:52Z</published><updated>2011-11-20T16:29:52Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img style="width: 400px;" src="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/storage/ultrasound.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1321807818335" alt="" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>The prompt: </em></p>
<p><em>Suppose that tomorrow you were faced with a woman in a similar situation, and an estimated fetal weight of 10 pounds. Would you offer her an elective C-section? Why or why not? How would you counsel her about the risks? Could you do that without mentioning the risk of death? In what way would that be different than playing the &#8220;dead baby card?&#8221; Please tell me the specific language that you would use as a doctor. Mother has diet controlled gestational diabetes and otherwise uncomplicated pregnancy.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>U.S. Cesarean Rate Drops for First Time in More Than a Decade</title><category term="Cesarean Rate"/><category term="U.S. Cesarean Rate"/><category term="U.S. Cesarean Rate Drops for First Time in More Than a Decade"/><category term="c-section rate 2010"/><category term="cesarean rate 2011"/><category term="cesarean rate drops"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/17/us-cesarean-rate-drops-for-first-time-in-more-than-a-decade.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/17/us-cesarean-rate-drops-for-first-time-in-more-than-a-decade.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-17T17:01:00Z</published><updated>2011-11-17T17:01:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[The CDC&rsquo;s National Center for Health Statistics just released the latest birth statistics for the United States. According to the report, Births: Preliminary Data for 2010, the national cesarean rate dropped from 32.9% to 32.8%. This is the first time in more than a decade that the rate has not increased.
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Mission Accomplished!</title><category term="Cesarean Rate"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/17/mission-accomplished.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/17/mission-accomplished.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-17T17:00:00Z</published><updated>2011-11-17T17:00:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[High fives for all regular readers of The Unnecesarean who saw this PhotoShop coming.
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Cesarean Rates by State, 2010</title><category term="Cesarean Rate"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/17/cesarean-rates-by-state-2010.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/17/cesarean-rates-by-state-2010.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-17T17:00:00Z</published><updated>2011-11-17T17:00:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[Cesarean delivery rates by state, 2010.
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Congresswoman Roybal-Allard Applauds the Home Birth Consensus Summit</title><category term="Home Birth"/><category term="home birth consensus summit statement"/><category term="home birth summit"/><category term="roybal-allard birth"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/16/congresswoman-roybal-allard-applauds-the-home-birth-consensu.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/16/congresswoman-roybal-allard-applauds-the-home-birth-consensu.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-16T22:46:46Z</published><updated>2011-11-16T22:46:46Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C. - Congresswoman Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34) spoke in the House of Representatives today to recognize the significance of the consensus document produced by the Home Birth Consensus Summit that took place in Warrenton, VA between October 20 and 22.[Click over to watch video]
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Monday Open Thread</title><category term="Open Thread"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/14/monday-open-thread.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/14/monday-open-thread.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-14T21:55:19Z</published><updated>2011-11-14T21:55:19Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div>
<p><a class="addthis_button" href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=unnecesarean"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" alt="Bookmark and Share" width="83" height="16" /></a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#username=unnecesarean"></script></p>
<!-- AddThis Button END -->
<p><a type="button_count" name="fb_share" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php">Share</a><script src="http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share" type="text/javascript"></script>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>Today&#8217;s open thread is hosted by A Rad Baby. Look at that punim! He&#8217;s extremely rad. My friend made him.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><span class="full-image-inline ssNonEditable"><span>&nbsp;</span></span></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style="width: 400px;" src="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/storage/rad_baby.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1321307967313" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br></p>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Jury awards $144 million for failure to perform a C-section</title><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/11/jury-awards-144-million-for-failure-to-perform-a-c-section.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/11/jury-awards-144-million-for-failure-to-perform-a-c-section.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-11T21:00:00Z</published><updated>2011-11-11T21:00:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[Geoffrey Fieger, famous for representing Dr. Jack Kervorkian, is now notable for a new reason. He just won one of the largest medical malpractice verdicts in history in an obstetric case. The claim? Failure to perform a C-section, of course.
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>OMG, R U SRSLY WRITING ABOUT THE VAMPIRE CESAREAN IN BREAKING DAWN?</title><category term="Birth in the Media"/><category term="bella birth"/><category term="bella edward baby"/><category term="bella pregnant vampire"/><category term="breaking dawn opens"/><category term="feminist review breaking dawn"/><category term="sociology breaking dawn"/><category term="vampire cesarean"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/9/omg-r-u-srsly-writing-about-the-vampire-cesarean-in-breaking.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/9/omg-r-u-srsly-writing-about-the-vampire-cesarean-in-breaking.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-09T13:00:00Z</published><updated>2011-11-09T13:00:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/storage/twilight_dolls_edward_bella.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1288010577188" alt="" /><br>
<br>
Yep. The vampire cesarean returns&#8230;
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>CDC Publishes "Births: Final Data for 2009"</title><category term="Births: Final Data for 2009"/><category term="Cesarean Rate"/><category term="cdc birth data"/><category term="cesarean rate 2009"/><category term="latest cesarean rate"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/8/cdc-publishes-births-final-data-for-2009.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/8/cdc-publishes-births-final-data-for-2009.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-08T13:01:30Z</published><updated>2011-11-08T13:01:30Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[Click over to read more.<br><img src="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/storage/2009-cs-rates-by-age-of-mot.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1320746821593" alt="" />
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Florida Cesarean Rates by Hospital, 2010</title><category term="Cesarean Rate"/><category term="Florida cesarean rate"/><category term="florida c-section rate"/><category term="miami taza de cesarea"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/6/florida-cesarean-rates-by-hospital-2010.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/6/florida-cesarean-rates-by-hospital-2010.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-06T12:00:00Z</published><updated>2011-11-06T12:00:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>CDC&#8217;s National Center for Health Statistics <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr59/nvsr59_03.pdf" target="_blank">reported</a> that the total cesarean rate for the state of Florida in 2009 was 38.1%, giving Florida the distinction of the having the fourth highest cesarean rate in the country following Louisiana, New Jersey and New York.</p>
<p>Florida has seven hospitals with total cesarean rates over 50%, with South Miami Hospital reporting that 61.8% of its 4,360 births were via cesarean section.</p>[Click over to view table and total rates]
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Second City's Completely Honest OB-GYN</title><category term="Birth in the Media"/><category term="c-section second city"/><category term="completely honest obgyn"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/2/second-citys-completely-honest-ob-gyn.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/2/second-citys-completely-honest-ob-gyn.html"/><author><name>Jill</name></author><published>2011-11-02T22:56:45Z</published><updated>2011-11-02T22:56:45Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">Warning: Salty language ahead</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/storage/market_thumb.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1320275360590" alt="" /></span></span></div>
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Home Birth Consensus Summit Statements</title><category term="Home Birth"/><category term="amy tuteur home birth"/><category term="amy tuteur home birth summit"/><category term="home birth consensus statement"/><category term="home birth summit statement"/><category term="homebirthsummit.org"/><category term="tuteur home birth consensus statement"/><category term="unnecesarean home birth consensus"/><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/1/home-birth-consensus-summit-statements.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/11/1/home-birth-consensus-summit-statements.html"/><author><name>ANaturalAdvocate</name></author><published>2011-11-01T23:30:07Z</published><updated>2011-11-01T23:30:07Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[Recently, both Jill Arnold and Tara N. Gaston attended the Home Birth Consensus Summit along with representatives from a number of groups with a stake in home birth (see the stakeholder list <a href="http://www.homebirthsummit.org/who-will-be-represented.html">here</a>). After much work, thought, and a bit of fun, the assembled delegates were able to reach a consensus and worked together to create the following statement. None of the statements necessary reflect the opinion or agreement of any organization with which any of the delegates may be affiliated (you can find the list of delegates and biographical information <a href="http://www.homebirthsummit.org/delegates.html">here</a>). The statements are obviously very broad, but the delegates also worked together to create action plans, some of which are already being implemented.&nbsp;
]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Insurance Coverage and Elective Cesareans In New Jersey</title><id>http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/10/28/insurance-coverage-and-elective-cesareans-in-new-jersey.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2011/10/28/insurance-coverage-and-elective-cesareans-in-new-jersey.html"/><author><name>ANaturalAdvocate</name></author><published>2011-10-28T17:53:38Z</published><updated>2011-10-28T17:53:38Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[A new article in the American Journal of Public Health looks at the elective cesarean delivery rates of women with various forms of insurance coverage, including private plans, Medicaid, and self-payers. &#8220;Whether primary prelabor cesarean delivery is indicated matters for health policy. If a substantial number of these surgeries were not medically indicated, then education, financial incentives for vaginal deliveries, and other management tools could reduce the rate of elective cesarean delivery procedures. If they are indicated, a rising rate implies either that maternal health is worsening or that changes in obstetric practice are broadening the set of clinical indications, or both.&#8221;
]]></summary></entry></feed>
