Looking for something? Start here.
Custom Search

 

Want The Unnecesarean in your inbox? Enter your email address:




 

   

Entries from March 1, 2009 - March 31, 2009

Tuesday
Mar312009

C-Sections in the News and Maternal Request Poll Results

A Sydney urogynecologist studied 9,000 births and found that women have a greater chance of losing a baby from the complications of a cesarean than getting incontinence problems.

 

The woman in this Poughkeepsie Journal article, Kristi Ashley, endured malpractice for which there is no recourse… yet. She was told her baby would weigh 12 lbs., 10 oz. and she agreed to surgery. Her baby actually weighed 9 lbs., 4 oz. at birth. There is no difference between this wrong diagnosis and any other that results in a patient undergoing unnecessary major surgery, except that unnecessary c-sections are viewed as playing it safe.

 

The results of the highly scientific (!) poll asking how many women people personally know who requested a c-section with no medical indication are:

 

63% (24 votes)—Zero

26% (10 votes)—One

3% (1 vote)—Two

8% (3 votes)—3 to 5

0%— More than five

 

Like many of you, it’s hard for me to discuss true maternal request c-sections without knowing many women who have requested them. It’s definitely not a non-issue because for the handful of women who want one, it matters. The elective cesarean rhetorical debate has been blown way out of proportion in obstetrics and by the media when compared to dismissive medical attitude toward reversing VBAC bans and sparing women (like Kristi Ashley, above) from unnecessary cesareans.

 

Mom’s Tinfoil Hat had a pro-maternal request cesarean visitor come by to discuss the issue. Rixa (from Stand and Deliver) asked her readers for their thoughts on the ethics of refusing to perform a c-section at a woman’s request.

 

Thank you for sharing your thoughts and participating in the poll.

 

Bookmark and Share